In case you missed it: Adam Gopnik’s essay “On Updike’s Long Game”

Adam Gopnik wrote a feature titled “A Fan’s Notes on Updike’s Long Game” for Humanties magazine, Vol. 29 No. 3 (May/June 2008) that finds him concluding that “if the persistent journalist in him is one of the things that has kept his novels alive, it is the satirist and humorist in him that have kept his sentences aloft,” further speculating, “Updike’s affinity for painting and poetry—the still felt desire to have been a painter or poet—is perhaps the secret fuel that keeps the prose shining and still in motion.”

 

Milwaukee blogger considers “Wife-wooing” and other Updike stories

UpdikeJim Higgins of the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel posted another consideration of an Updike story yesterday, still fulfilling his declared purpose of “reading and commenting on a story from The Library of America’s John Updike: The Collected Stories each Wednesday until I finish the collection or give up.” One week’s post was “Wife-wooing.” His full intent is explained in an Introduction, and thus far he’s posted musings on:

“A Sense of Shelter”
“Packed Dirt, Churchgoing, a Dying Cat, a Traded Car”
“The Blessed Man of Boston, My Grandmother’s Thimble, and Fanning Island”
“The Crow in the Woods”
“Lifeguard”
“The Doctor’s Wife”
“A&P”
“The Astronomer”**
“You’ll Never Know, Dear, How Much I Love You”
“The Sea’s Green Sameness”
“Archangel”
“Home”
“Pigeon Feathers”**
“A Sense of Shelter”
“Dear Alexandros”
“Should Wizard Hit Mommy?”
“Flight”**
“The Persistence of Desire”
“Walter Briggs”
“The Happiest I’ve Been”**
“The Alligators”
“Intercession”
“A Gift from the City”
“Incest”
“A Trillion Feet of Gas”
“The Lucid Eye in Silver Town”
“Sunday Teasing”
“His Finest Hour”**
“Who Made Yellow Roses Yellow?”
“Snowing in Greenwich Village”
“Toward Evening”
“The Kid’s Whistling”
“Dentistry and Doubt”
“Tomorrow and Tomorrow and So Forth”**
“A Game of Botticelli”
“Friends from Philadelphia”
“Ace in the Hole”
“Unstuck”**
“In Football Season”
“The Indian”
“The Stare”**
“Leaves”
“Solitaire”**
“My Uncle’s Death”
“A Madman”
“Avec la Bebe-sitter”
“Four Sides of One Story”
“The Morning”
“At a Bar in Charlotte Amalie”

Titles with two asterisks he says would make his “hypothetical Best of John Updike collection.” Check back. We’ll add titles as he posts them.

Member elicits responses from Updike readers

Member John McTavish is eliciting responses from John Updike readers regarding such questions as how they discovered JU, their favorite JU book (and why), which book (and why) they would recommend to new readers, and a memorable line (or lines, or paragraph) from JU.

“I hope to collate the results of the survey and publish them,” McTavish says, “but publish or not, I will email a copy of the accumulated results to all the participants.”

McTavish says he’s already received some “sparkling replies” from a number of people, including Don Greiner, Jack De Bellis, and Biljana Dojcinovic. Send your responses to him at: jmctav@vianet.ca

Continue reading

Granta editor’s book on author encounters includes Updike

Screen Shot 2014-01-24 at 11.06.12 PMFormer Granta editor John Freeman interviewed a lot of major writers over the course of 13 years—a number that proved lucky for him, as those encounters inspired a book, How to Read a Novelist (Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 334 pages). Included is “U and Me: The Hard Lessons of Idolizing John Updike.”

“He’s a great reader, of novels and novelists (hence this collection’s title),” Chris Vognar of the Dallas Morning News writes. “True to his mission, however, Freeman is quick to get out of the way when the writers have something to say.”

“The only thing an interviewer can do to capture what a novelist does,” [Freeman] writes, “is to make them talk and tell stories, and think aloud. These are not meant to be definitive life profiles but rather glimpses spied through a moving window.”

Book review: ‘How to Read a Novelist,’ by John Freeman

Author and book reviewer draws inspiration from Updike

updikecaricatureAuthor Nick Mattiske writes that he has published a book of reviews in Australia, and in the introduction he draws inspiration from John Updike to “make a few rambling points about reviewing. The introduction also includes a caricature of Updike,” he says, and he “reproduced part of this introduction and the caricature as the first post on my blog,” which can be found here:

“On Ronald Blythe’s almost-most-recent book”

Before he gets into his own book, Mr. Mattiske evaluates another: “As John Updike has noted,” he begins, “Blythe’s work has a particularity about it regarding place that sometimes requires from the reader a measure of understanding of local village and parish life with which Blythe is saturated.”

When he gets to his own volume he cites an Updike quotation: “The communication between reviewer and his public is based upon the presumption of certain possible joys of reading, and all our discrimination should curve toward that end.”

Mattiske concludes, “The best reviews open doors to rooms never previously noticed that enrich the reader’s or listener’s experience. There is sometimes a great need for negativity, if that means the critique of sloppy thinking rather than merely the reviewer’s personal distaste, but Updike is right: when one has the pleasure of being immersed in books and music, some measure of enthusiasm should spark off onto the reader.”

Blogger discovers, reviews HUGGING THE SHORE

269332For Dorothy Borders, who writes “The Nature of Things” blog, John Updike was “a master wordsmith.” In Hugging the Shore by John Updike: A review” of Updike’s 1983 collection of essays and criticism, she notes,

“He could string words together with the best of them, and it is a pleasure to read his smooth and flowing sentences, even when those sentences were written on a subject that didn’t necessarily interest me, like golf. Just to view his writerly craftsmanship was an instruction to the art of writing. I expect I will continue to dip into this book for months to come.”

Updike urinalia? Opinion piece quotes WOE

Screen Shot 2014-01-16 at 7.54.04 AMYou never know what line from an Updike book is going to be quoted and used in an article. In an ed-op piece titled “Has the urinal had its day?” (posted January 11, 2014), HeraldScotland.com senior features writer Barry Didcock begins,

“I don’t have the paperback to hand so I’m relying on my fading memory of the novel, but there’s a line in John Updike’s The Witches of Eastwick in which one of the female protagonists talks about men ‘lording it’ over the toilet bowl.

“She’s referring to their—our—ability to pee standing up.”

Didcock uses that quote as a springboard to a speculative discussion of how the urinal may be nearing the end of its life. But he doesn’t consider sporting events or concerts. Without urinals, the lines at those events would be as interminably long as they are for women.

New Yorker blogpost on Writers and Rum mentions Updike

Screen Shot 2014-01-12 at 9.51.34 AMOn January 9, 2014, Adam Gopnik posted a think piece on The New Yorker website titled “Writers and Rum,” in which he writes,

“At the other, soberer end, John Updike once said to an admirer that the reason for the astonishing longevity he shared with Philip Roth—not just achieving the second acts that Fitzgerald said were impossible in American lives but third acts and fourth acts and then both men appearing, so to speak, out in the lobby to shake hands and do card tricks after the show—was, simply, that neither drank. He brought it up because he knew it was unusual.  Growing up, he had absorbed the notion that a good writer wasn’t just possibly a drunk; a good writer had to be a drunk to be any good at all. . . .”

Begley buzz: a “most anticipated” book

Screen Shot 2014-01-07 at 5.23.42 PMIt’s not just Updike scholars who seem excited to see what Adam Begley has to say in his unauthorized biography Updike, which is due in bookstores on April 8. The book was also included by a contributing editor of The Millions in a feature on “Most Anticipated: The Great 2014 Book Preview.” 

“What’s left to say about John Updike that Updike didn’t already say exhaustively, and say better than anyone else could have?” Garth Risk Hallberg asks, sounding eerily like Updike himself.

“Yet Adam Begley has apparently found enough fresh material, or a fresh enough angle on the well-trod, to fill 576 pages. For a primer on Updike, there’s no way this book can surpass Nicholson Baker’s U & I, but it’s always a good sign when a literary biographer is a novelist himself.”

Begley’s Updike biography is also one of the books singled out in USA Today‘s “Winter Books preview: From Nancy Horan to Robin Roberts.”