{"id":6993,"date":"2026-05-31T10:11:25","date_gmt":"2026-05-31T15:11:25","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/blogs.iwu.edu\/johnupdikesociety\/?p=6993"},"modified":"2026-05-31T10:11:25","modified_gmt":"2026-05-31T15:11:25","slug":"rogers-version-leaves-blogger-with-mixed-feelings","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blogs.iwu.edu\/johnupdikesociety\/2026\/05\/31\/rogers-version-leaves-blogger-with-mixed-feelings\/","title":{"rendered":"Roger&#8217;s Version leaves blogger with mixed feelings"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Thomas Bevilacqua, a Ph.D. who teaches high school English at The Maclay School in Florida, recently posted his reaction to John Updike&#8217;s <em>Roger&#8217;s Version\u00a0<\/em>on <a href=\"https:\/\/thomasbevilacqua.substack.com\/p\/john-updike-book-review-rogers-version-novel-scarlet-letter-american-literature\">his Substack blog<\/a>:<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/blogs.iwu.edu\/johnupdikesociety\/2022\/06\/04\/shortlist-writer-lists-books-that-would-make-great-movies\/rogers-version\/\" rel=\"attachment wp-att-5503\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignright size-medium wp-image-5503\" src=\"https:\/\/blogs.iwu.edu\/johnupdikesociety\/files\/2022\/06\/Rogers-Version-194x300.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"194\" height=\"300\" srcset=\"https:\/\/blogs.iwu.edu\/johnupdikesociety\/files\/2022\/06\/Rogers-Version-194x300.jpg 194w, https:\/\/blogs.iwu.edu\/johnupdikesociety\/files\/2022\/06\/Rogers-Version.jpg 200w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 194px) 100vw, 194px\" \/><\/a>&#8220;It&#8217;s pretty clear to me why <em>Roger&#8217;s Version\u00a0<\/em>is frequently pointed to as one of Updike&#8217;s best novels. You see some of the recurring themes from the Rabbit novels\u2014sex, theology, relationships, America\u2014but it&#8217;s presented in a more direct or less ponderous way. The two Rabbit novels I&#8217;ve read (<em>Rabbit, Run<\/em> and <em>Rabbit Redux<\/em>) are a bit more ground in their historical moment . . . while <em>Roger&#8217;s Version<\/em> is a bit removed from that, though it is obviously and quite pointedly set in the Reagan moment,&#8221; Bevilacqua wrote.<\/p>\n<p>The problem, for Bevilacqua, was Updike&#8217;s &#8220;engagement with, well, sex, to put it bluntly. I don&#8217;t think I&#8217;m terribly prudish when it comes to what I can read, but I always find how Updike writes about these things to be somewhat strange. Perhaps because they feel so alien relative to everything else he&#8217;s writing while someone like Philip Roth makes it feel more central. . . . The entanglements of Roger and Verna as well as Dale and Esther feel shocking, not just because of what is being depicted or considered by how it feels . . . dropped in. I don&#8217;t think Updike puts these things in just to shock us, but it feels that way and it drags me as a reader out of the narrative he&#8217;s crafted.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Bevilacqua concluded, &#8220;<em>Roger&#8217;s Version<\/em> fits very much in my experience of Updike&#8217;s writing\u2014both engrossing but also frustrating, and yet I feel compelled to read more.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>If that compulsion holds, perhaps Bevilacqua might try the other two novels in Updike&#8217;s <em>Scarlet Letter<\/em> trilogy, in which Updike updated and retold Hawthorne&#8217;s story of an adulterous triangle from perspective of each of the main characters, starting with the Dimmesdale character (<em>A Month of Sundays<\/em>, 1975) and ending with the Hester character (<em>S.<\/em>, 1988), with the voyeuristic <em>Roger&#8217;s Version<\/em> falling in the middle (1986).<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Thomas Bevilacqua, a Ph.D. who teaches high school English at The Maclay School in Florida, recently posted his reaction to John Updike&#8217;s Roger&#8217;s Version\u00a0on his Substack blog: &#8220;It&#8217;s pretty clear to me why Roger&#8217;s Version\u00a0is frequently pointed to as one &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/blogs.iwu.edu\/johnupdikesociety\/2026\/05\/31\/rogers-version-leaves-blogger-with-mixed-feelings\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":818,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[6,53],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-6993","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-first-person-singular","category-updike-in-context"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.iwu.edu\/johnupdikesociety\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6993","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.iwu.edu\/johnupdikesociety\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.iwu.edu\/johnupdikesociety\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.iwu.edu\/johnupdikesociety\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/818"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.iwu.edu\/johnupdikesociety\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=6993"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.iwu.edu\/johnupdikesociety\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6993\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":6994,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.iwu.edu\/johnupdikesociety\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6993\/revisions\/6994"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.iwu.edu\/johnupdikesociety\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=6993"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.iwu.edu\/johnupdikesociety\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=6993"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.iwu.edu\/johnupdikesociety\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=6993"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}