{"id":4474,"date":"2018-05-27T09:44:40","date_gmt":"2018-05-27T14:44:40","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/blogs.iwu.edu\/johnupdikesociety\/?p=4474"},"modified":"2018-05-27T09:44:40","modified_gmt":"2018-05-27T14:44:40","slug":"british-tv-adaptation-of-the-rabbit-novels-to-dispel-notions-of-misogyny","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blogs.iwu.edu\/johnupdikesociety\/2018\/05\/27\/british-tv-adaptation-of-the-rabbit-novels-to-dispel-notions-of-misogyny\/","title":{"rendered":"British TV adaptation of the Rabbit novels to dispel notions of misogyny"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a href=\"https:\/\/blogs.iwu.edu\/johnupdikesociety\/files\/2018\/05\/Screen-Shot-2018-05-27-at-8.19.45-AM.png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignright size-medium wp-image-4475\" src=\"https:\/\/blogs.iwu.edu\/johnupdikesociety\/files\/2018\/05\/Screen-Shot-2018-05-27-at-8.19.45-AM-266x300.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"266\" height=\"300\" srcset=\"https:\/\/blogs.iwu.edu\/johnupdikesociety\/files\/2018\/05\/Screen-Shot-2018-05-27-at-8.19.45-AM-266x300.png 266w, https:\/\/blogs.iwu.edu\/johnupdikesociety\/files\/2018\/05\/Screen-Shot-2018-05-27-at-8.19.45-AM.png 330w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 266px) 100vw, 266px\" \/><\/a>In the Sunday, May 27, 2018 <em>Guardian<\/em>, <strong>Mark Brown<\/strong> wrote an update about Andrew Davies, &#8220;Britain&#8217;s most successful literary adaptor for television,&#8221; and his intentions for an upcoming adaptation of John Updike&#8217;s Harry &#8220;Rabbit&#8221; Angstrom novels.<\/p>\n<p>As Brown writes, &#8220;The project comes with something of a mission. &#8216;This lazy way that people talk about him being a misogynist,&#8217; Davies said. &#8216;This is something we are just going to wipe out really when they see how richly empathetic and imaginative the books are.'&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;The project raises the question of how, in the era of #MeToo, TV and filmmakers should depict behaviour which would not be acceptable now.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;The script editor Laura Lankester said there was no getting around the fact that people in the 1960s behaved the way they did, and there was a balancing act in not denying it and portraying it in an acceptable way for a contemporary audience.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Davies said: &#8216;I think they behave exactly the same now, but it is kind of wrong now.&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;The 81 year old said he had the advantage of working with much younger people than himself, including a script editor on <em>Rabbit, Run<\/em> who is in her mid-20s. &#8216;She has had problems with some bits of <em>Rabbit, Run<\/em> and it was been very interesting to deal with all that,&#8217; he said.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;&#8216;We do want people, if not to love Rabbit but at least to understand him. Some of the things have been a bit difficult for young intelligent females to cope with . . . but I think his insight into both men and women is just so extraordinary.'&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>No cast or time frame has been announced for the project by Davies, whose adaptation of <em>Les Miserables<\/em> will be shown on BBC later this year.<\/p>\n<p>The photo of Davies is by Martin Godwin of the <em>Guardian<\/em>.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>In the Sunday, May 27, 2018 Guardian, Mark Brown wrote an update about Andrew Davies, &#8220;Britain&#8217;s most successful literary adaptor for television,&#8221; and his intentions for an upcoming adaptation of John Updike&#8217;s Harry &#8220;Rabbit&#8221; Angstrom novels. As Brown writes, &#8220;The &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/blogs.iwu.edu\/johnupdikesociety\/2018\/05\/27\/british-tv-adaptation-of-the-rabbit-novels-to-dispel-notions-of-misogyny\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":818,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[24],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-4474","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-performances"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.iwu.edu\/johnupdikesociety\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4474","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.iwu.edu\/johnupdikesociety\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.iwu.edu\/johnupdikesociety\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.iwu.edu\/johnupdikesociety\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/818"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.iwu.edu\/johnupdikesociety\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4474"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.iwu.edu\/johnupdikesociety\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4474\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":4476,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.iwu.edu\/johnupdikesociety\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4474\/revisions\/4476"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.iwu.edu\/johnupdikesociety\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4474"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.iwu.edu\/johnupdikesociety\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4474"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.iwu.edu\/johnupdikesociety\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4474"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}