{"id":2849,"date":"2015-03-18T07:05:20","date_gmt":"2015-03-18T12:05:20","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/blogs.iwu.edu\/johnupdikesociety\/?p=2849"},"modified":"2015-03-18T07:05:20","modified_gmt":"2015-03-18T12:05:20","slug":"schlemiel-theory-on-cynthia-ozicks-denunciation-of-henry-bech","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blogs.iwu.edu\/johnupdikesociety\/2015\/03\/18\/schlemiel-theory-on-cynthia-ozicks-denunciation-of-henry-bech\/","title":{"rendered":"Schlemiel Theory: On Cynthia Ozick&#8217;s Denunciation of Henry Bech"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>They say there&#8217;s a blog about everything, and yesterday at <em><strong>The Home of Schlemiel Theory<\/strong>\u00a0<\/em>a writer going by the user name mfeuer2012 published a piece <a href=\"http:\/\/schlemielintheory.com\/2015\/03\/17\/on-cynthia-ozicks-denunciation-of-henry-bech-john-updikes-literary-portrayal-of-the-jew-as-schlemiel\/\">&#8220;On Cynthia Ozick&#8217;s Denunciation of Henry Bech: John Updike&#8217;s Literary Portrayal of the Jew as Schlemiel,&#8221;<\/a> the title of which may go a long ways toward explaining.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/blogs.iwu.edu\/johnupdikesociety\/files\/2015\/03\/images-3.jpeg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignleft size-full wp-image-2850\" src=\"https:\/\/blogs.iwu.edu\/johnupdikesociety\/files\/2015\/03\/images-3.jpeg\" alt=\"images-3\" width=\"85\" height=\"131\" \/><\/a>Ozick called Bech &#8220;theologically hollow&#8221; and according to the author &#8220;her reasons for choosing such a term and making such a trenchant criticism of Updike&#8217;s attempt to represent a Jew are noteworthy. They give us a sense of how Ozick\u2014and others\u2014might criticize many of the schlemiels we see in literature and film today. It also gives us a glimpse of her criterion for what makes for a plausible Jewish character in Jewish American fiction.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Citing other novels as well, the author writes, &#8220;Ozick&#8217;s gloss on these &#8216;de-Judaicized Jewish novelists&#8217; foreshadows her rant on what is missing not just in Bech but in most Jewish writing today: knowledge of Jewish history. But this omission is not done out of neglect so much as what Ozick calls &#8216;autolobotomy.&#8217; Wondering at this caricature of the Jew, Ozick suggests we think about how this would sound if this kind of portrayal were done with respect to real African-Americans.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Later: &#8220;Updike, argues Ozick, loves Bech most when he is &#8216;thoroughly de-Beched&#8217;\u2014when &#8216;Bech is most openly, most shrewdly, most strategically, most lyrically Updike&#8217; (119). And this happens when the &#8216;Appropriate Reference Machine&#8217; (ARM from here on) breaks down. At these moments of failure, Updike the theologian takes over.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;And in these moments, when the ARM breaks, there is a brief exposure to a Christeological kind of epiphany. However, this doesn&#8217;t transform Beck. Rather he returns to a kind of state that is . . . comical.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Read the <a href=\"http:\/\/schlemielintheory.com\/2015\/03\/17\/on-cynthia-ozicks-denunciation-of-henry-bech-john-updikes-literary-portrayal-of-the-jew-as-schlemiel\/\">entire article<\/a>.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>They say there&#8217;s a blog about everything, and yesterday at The Home of Schlemiel Theory\u00a0a writer going by the user name mfeuer2012 published a piece &#8220;On Cynthia Ozick&#8217;s Denunciation of Henry Bech: John Updike&#8217;s Literary Portrayal of the Jew as &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/blogs.iwu.edu\/johnupdikesociety\/2015\/03\/18\/schlemiel-theory-on-cynthia-ozicks-denunciation-of-henry-bech\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":33,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[26],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2849","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-scholarship-analysis"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.iwu.edu\/johnupdikesociety\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2849","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.iwu.edu\/johnupdikesociety\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.iwu.edu\/johnupdikesociety\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.iwu.edu\/johnupdikesociety\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/33"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.iwu.edu\/johnupdikesociety\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2849"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.iwu.edu\/johnupdikesociety\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2849\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2851,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.iwu.edu\/johnupdikesociety\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2849\/revisions\/2851"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.iwu.edu\/johnupdikesociety\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2849"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.iwu.edu\/johnupdikesociety\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2849"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.iwu.edu\/johnupdikesociety\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2849"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}