{"id":2474,"date":"2014-09-13T08:56:50","date_gmt":"2014-09-13T13:56:50","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/blogs.iwu.edu\/johnupdikesociety\/?p=2474"},"modified":"2014-09-13T08:56:50","modified_gmt":"2014-09-13T13:56:50","slug":"national-review-is-looking-at-updike-again","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blogs.iwu.edu\/johnupdikesociety\/2014\/09\/13\/national-review-is-looking-at-updike-again\/","title":{"rendered":"National Review is Looking at Updike, Again"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>&#8220;It&#8217;s not cool to like the writing of John Updike,&#8221; <em>National Review<\/em>&#8216;s Michael Potemra declares in <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nationalreview.com\/corner\/387549\/looking-updike-again-michael-potemra\">&#8220;Looking at Updike, Again.&#8221;<\/a> &#8220;But it&#8217;s the right thing to do.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Wasn&#8217;t that what actor Wilford Brimley told us about eating oatmeal?<\/p>\n<p>Potemra explains that the &#8220;anti-feminist rap against Updike deserves, in our current cultural plight, a little more attention. The <em>locus classicus<\/em> of this opinion was the famous phrase of David Foster Wallace, who quoted a female friend&#8217;s gibe that Updike was &#8216;a penis with a thesaurus.&#8217; Now, David Foster Wallace has basically been canonized as a secular saint, and to be dismissed by him in this fashion amounts to having the phrase NOT. COOL. branded on your forehead.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Potemra was apparently inspired to reconsider Updike after reading\u00a0a <em>New Republic<\/em> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.newrepublic.com\/article\/119200\/updike-reviewed-william-deresiewicz?utm_source=Sailthru&amp;utm_medium=email&amp;utm_term=TNR%20Daily%20Newsletter&amp;utm_campaign=TNR%20Daily%20Zephyr%20with%20LiveIntent%20-%2009092014\">book review<\/a> of Adam Begley&#8217;s <em>Updike<\/em> by William Deresiewicz, whom he quotes:<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Updike\u2014and Mailer, and Roth, and the other men (and women) of their generation\u2014were situated at a complicated juncture in the history of sexuality. They came of age before the revolution, but not so long before that they couldn&#8217;t try to join it. Sexual freedom descended on them not as a birthright, but as a miracle. Of course they went a little wild. When the Pill came out in 1960, the oldest member of the baby boom was fourteen. Updike was 28. If he spent a lot of time thinking about sex, it&#8217;s not a big surprise. Updike, like his contemporaries, was also too early for feminism. That may not be conducive to the most progressive attitudes . . . but it also means that Updike stood between the old and new Victorianisms.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Potemra adds, &#8220;Deresiewicz is pointing to something important: Updike, as a man of his generation, did not view ideologizing about men and women to be his basic calling in life. It was sufficient for him to <em>watch<\/em> men and women, to <em>notice<\/em>, and to record his observations in some of the best prose ever produced by an American writer.&#8221;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>&#8220;It&#8217;s not cool to like the writing of John Updike,&#8221; National Review&#8216;s Michael Potemra declares in &#8220;Looking at Updike, Again.&#8221; &#8220;But it&#8217;s the right thing to do.&#8221; Wasn&#8217;t that what actor Wilford Brimley told us about eating oatmeal? Potemra explains &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/blogs.iwu.edu\/johnupdikesociety\/2014\/09\/13\/national-review-is-looking-at-updike-again\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":33,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[6,26],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2474","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-first-person-singular","category-scholarship-analysis"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.iwu.edu\/johnupdikesociety\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2474","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.iwu.edu\/johnupdikesociety\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.iwu.edu\/johnupdikesociety\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.iwu.edu\/johnupdikesociety\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/33"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.iwu.edu\/johnupdikesociety\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2474"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.iwu.edu\/johnupdikesociety\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2474\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2475,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.iwu.edu\/johnupdikesociety\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2474\/revisions\/2475"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.iwu.edu\/johnupdikesociety\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2474"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.iwu.edu\/johnupdikesociety\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2474"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.iwu.edu\/johnupdikesociety\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2474"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}