{"id":2192,"date":"2014-06-23T07:16:34","date_gmt":"2014-06-23T12:16:34","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/blogs.iwu.edu\/johnupdikesociety\/?p=2192"},"modified":"2014-06-23T07:16:34","modified_gmt":"2014-06-23T12:16:34","slug":"dybek-reviewer-cites-updike-as-a-major-influence","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blogs.iwu.edu\/johnupdikesociety\/2014\/06\/23\/dybek-reviewer-cites-updike-as-a-major-influence\/","title":{"rendered":"Dybek reviewer cites Updike as a major influence"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong><a href=\"https:\/\/blogs.iwu.edu\/johnupdikesociety\/files\/2014\/06\/paperlantern.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignright size-full wp-image-2193\" src=\"https:\/\/blogs.iwu.edu\/johnupdikesociety\/files\/2014\/06\/paperlantern.jpg\" alt=\"paperlantern\" width=\"80\" height=\"120\" \/><\/a>Charles Finch<\/strong>, in writing a review of MacArthur recipient Stuart Dybek&#8217;s most recent collections of short fiction, <em>Paper Lantern<\/em> and <em>Ecstatic Cahoots<\/em>, begins by trying to describe a style of writing that he feels is characteristic of the American short story, and credits John Updike for being a progenitor of style:<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;For a while there the American short story was in dismal shape. It was never a problem of skill\u2014many of the notable story collections of the 1990s and 2000s were technically beautiful, morally subtle, narratively refined\u2014as much as a problem of tone. The stories that dominated the serious magazines and journals seemed to share a flat fireless quality, something like politeness, perhaps even fear. It was all so tasteful. The sense of drama was minimal. Characters dropped half out of love, or endured a minor crisis, or just wandered around treasuring their sense of dismay about, you know, the fallenness of the world. And above all, of course: that wheedling and constant push toward epiphany.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/blogs.iwu.edu\/johnupdikesociety\/files\/2014\/06\/ecstaticcahoots.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignleft size-full wp-image-2194\" src=\"https:\/\/blogs.iwu.edu\/johnupdikesociety\/files\/2014\/06\/ecstaticcahoots.jpg\" alt=\"ecstaticcahoots\" width=\"80\" height=\"121\" \/><\/a>&#8220;I think of John Updike&#8217;s 1961 story &#8216;A&amp;P&#8217; as either the infectious agent or the patient zero of this style. It&#8217;s narrated by a teenager working in a grocery store, who quits on behalf of a group of girls his manager is hassling for shopping in bathing suits. They don&#8217;t even notice his gallantry, and in the last line of the story he leaves the store, looks back, and says, &#8216;and my stomach kind of fell as I felt how hard the world was going to be to me hereafter.&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;What a line! No wonder its example has been intoxicating. Its vagueness expresses such a specific ache, and it expands the meaning of the story&#8217;s mild events to suddenly and deftly. Writers before Updike had used such a turn\u2014think of &#8216;Araby&#8217; or &#8216;The Little Joke&#8217;\u2014but his captured some modernist blend of longing, boredom, and elegy just behind the speakable, which has lingered in the form ever since.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>But while, in his <em>Slate<\/em> review, Finch has praise for the master, he&#8217;s critical of the limitations that imitation has imposed on American short fiction.<\/p>\n<p>Read the whole review\u00a0in <a href=\"http:\/\/www.slate.com\/articles\/arts\/books\/2014\/06\/stuart_dybek_s_short_story_collections_ecstatic_cahoots_and_paper_lantern.html\">&#8220;The &#8216;A&amp;P&#8217; Problem,&#8221;<\/a> published June 6, 2014.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Charles Finch, in writing a review of MacArthur recipient Stuart Dybek&#8217;s most recent collections of short fiction, Paper Lantern and Ecstatic Cahoots, begins by trying to describe a style of writing that he feels is characteristic of the American short &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/blogs.iwu.edu\/johnupdikesociety\/2014\/06\/23\/dybek-reviewer-cites-updike-as-a-major-influence\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":33,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[6,11],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2192","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-first-person-singular","category-reviews"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.iwu.edu\/johnupdikesociety\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2192","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.iwu.edu\/johnupdikesociety\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.iwu.edu\/johnupdikesociety\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.iwu.edu\/johnupdikesociety\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/33"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.iwu.edu\/johnupdikesociety\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2192"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.iwu.edu\/johnupdikesociety\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2192\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2195,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.iwu.edu\/johnupdikesociety\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2192\/revisions\/2195"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.iwu.edu\/johnupdikesociety\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2192"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.iwu.edu\/johnupdikesociety\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2192"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.iwu.edu\/johnupdikesociety\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2192"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}