MPTF Contact Information
Feb 4th, 2008 by Pat Zehr
Everything submitted will be read by the committee but only signed submissions will be considered. If requested, we will keep the individual submitting feedback anonymous to the IWU community.
Dan Klotzbach
dklotzba {at} iwu(.)edu
Holmes 109
556- 3021
Kathy Cavins
kcavins {at} iwu(.)edu
Holmes 209
556-3111
Beth Cunningham
bcunning {at} iwu(.)edu
Holmes 202
556-3101
Karen Schmidt
karens {at} iwu(.)edu
The Ames Library
556-3834
Cathy Spitz
cspitz {at} iwu(.)edu
Holmes 200
556-3536
Connie Vail
cvail {at} iwu(.)edu
Alumni Relations
556-3093
Pat Zehr
pzehr {at} iwu(.)edu
Stevenson 17
556-3997
Are there any links to materials you’ve reviewed as a committee? What are our peer schools doing that has worked well? Are there methods that have been used previously (at other institutions) and have been abandoned due to undesired outcomes? Are we focused on choosing a single method of Merit pay/recognition, or might there be multiple options -for different kinds of recognition (e.g. one type of merit recognition for a particular contribution to the University like a recommendation on how the University could save x number of dollars by doing ’such-and-such’ and a different type of merit recognition for someone who might add a new dimension of long-lasting service or depth to their department or the University as a whole)? The purpose and focus of this committee is exciting and I apologize for having more questions than input at this time.
Could you please provide a clearier explanation of a “signed suggestion”, as you have indicated several different ways of communicating our feedback and comments.
Brian Sheehan
Comments submitted via the blog will have identification as they are submitted. If the person submitting the comment would prefer to have their posting anonymous, just use your blog nickname when posting. You can assign a nickname in your blog profile when you sign on. Letters and emails will need personal identification in order for the Task Force to take those comments into serious consideration.
Hey fellow staffers, let’s get the ball rolling here. If we don’t let the Committee know what we want/need, then we can’t be upset when things don’t go our way. In my opinion, I think that the only person that can evaluate my overall performance, would be my supervisor. I also think that most of us like a nice pat on the back occasionally, but, a pat on the back doesn’t pay our bills. I think the idea of using a percentage for every department is unfair as most departments have an entirely good and dedicated staff and the pay increase would amount to nothing. These are my thoughts, how about ya’ll (Southern expression) let’s here form you. Roy@IT